Money in Politics Snapshots
The most important things happening in the world of money in politics and ethics.
Each month, we sort through the news to to give you a rundown of the most important things that happened in the world of money in politics and ethics. From the executive to the legislative branch, to state-level fights and beyond, our handpicked “snapshots” are what you need to know if, like most Americans, you’re ready to return government to the people.
Here are the things from March 2017 that you need to know:
- Former administration officials failed to sign ethics pledges
- Three former Trump administration officials never signed mandatory ethics pledges, including former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, leading Issue One’s Meredith McGehee to tell the Associated Press: “At least so far, the ethical standards that are being applied to high-level officials coming in are quite incoherent and seemingly haphazard.”
- Ivanka Trump became an official White House employee (after backlash)
- After backlash to the announcement that Ivanka Trump would join her father’s White House as an adviser without an official role (and according to White House counsel, not subject to an ethics agreement), Ivanka issued a statement saying she would become an official White House employee. (But, experts says problems remain.)
- Ethics concerns plague Trump administration— from transition to present
- Carl Icahn’s dual role as investor and adviser to President Trump raised major ethics red flags.
- The Center for Responsive Politics found the Trump administration’s ‘beachhead’ transition team was comprised of dozens of lobbyists.
- Trump White House rejects ethics course
- The Trump White House reportedly rejected an ethics and management course designed to prepare officials for “some of the same issues that have become major stumbling blocks in the early days of the administration.” Both the Bush and Obama transition teams received the training.
- The actions of Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin publicly promoted ‘The LEGO Batman Movie,’ which his company produced, raised further questions of what ethics training (if any) high-level administration officials have received. Mnuchin later acknowledged he should not have made the statement.
- Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch’s money-in-politics views remain unclear
- U.S. Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch’s confirmation hearing testimony left senators and the public with “less clarity on his views on political spending, the Citizens United decision and the role of disclosure of money in politics” than before.
- 15 years of congressional inaction on money-in-politics reform
- March 27 marked the 15th anniversary of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, also known as “McCain-Feingold’ or BCRA, putting in stark relief the lack of a bipartisan, federal response to our dysfunctional campaign finance system since then.
- State legislatures, however, have been busy working on bipartisan reform, as ReThink Democracy outlined.
- Current and former representatives under investigation
- California Rep. Duncan Hunter is under a Justice Department criminal investigation for alleged campaign finance violations.
- Texas Rep. Steve Stockman was indicted on federal corruption charges for allegedly stealing from conservative foundations.
- The House Ethics Committee held its first public meeting this Congress
- South Dakota gets weaker reforms
- After the South Dakota Legislature nixed voter-approved ethics reforms, the South Dakota governor signed a weaker package of bills into law.
- The New Mexico legislature sent a bipartisan ‘dark-money’ bill to the governor’s desk.
KEY BILLS INTRODUCED:
- Rep. Gosar (R-AZ) H.R. 1341 – Stop Foreign Money Affecting Our Elections Act
- Sen. King (I-VT) S.589 – Real Time Transparency Act
Here are the things from February 2017 that you need to know:
- Issues with President Trump’s Cabinet keep popping up
- Betsy DeVos, a major Republican Party donor, was confirmed as the Secretary of Education, with 22 of the 23 Republican senators to whom the DeVos family donated voting for her confirmation.
- Tom Price was confirmed as Health and Human Services Secretary (despite raising major ethics concerns along the way).
- Kellyanne Conway, counselor to President Trump, appeared on Fox News to urge people to buy Ivanka Trump-brand products, igniting bipartisan condemnation and calls from the Office of Government Ethics for her to be disciplined.
- Commissioner Ann Ravel announces her resignation from the broken Federal Election Commission (FEC)
- Upon making her announcement, Ravel also released a damning report and a New York Times op-ed, claiming the FEC’s partisan gridlock was “betraying the American public and jeopardizing our democracy.”
- This establishes the first test for how President Trump will actually address money in politics reform: Will he fix the FEC, or further water down its enforcement abilities? Initial reports have not been promising.
- Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch’s money-in-politics stance called into question
- After President Trump nominated Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, the Campaign Legal Center released a report diving into his record on democracy law. One key finding? “Gorsuch’s judicial record on money in politics, while sparse, raises concerns.”
- A previously under-the-radar change to the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) shows the need for vigilance going forward
- After Issue One’s Chief of Policy Meredith McGehee pointed out one important, under-the-radar change to the OCE last month, the story finally gets larger publicity.
- McGehee took the opportunity to detail one new development to the story, namely Speaker Ryan’s appointment of “Doc” Hastings as OCE chair. Rep. Hastings formerly served as House Ethics Committee chair and has a checkered history with the OCE.
- In the same piece, she also outlined three ways that Congress could sneakily further weaken the office, requiring constant vigilance from the reform community going forward.
TRUMP’S FIRST ADDRESS TO A JOIN SESSION OF CONGRESS
- In his joint address to Congress, President Trump laid out a broad agenda, from jobs and health care, to taxes and national security, for change in Washington. However, it failed to address the real culprit behind gridlock in Washington: the undue influence moneyed interests have on decision-making by elected and appointed officials. Here is Issue One’s full response.
ALSO OF NOTE:
- A steady stream of conflicts arose between the Trump Organization and the office of the presidency. The Defense Department announced it would lease space at Trump Tower, which Issue One’s Chief of Policy, Programs and Strategy Meredith McGehee cited as “one more example of how Trump has managed to use his business interests to profit off the presidency in ways never seen before.” See these other conflict stories that also broke last month.
- Seattle launched its campaign finance reform voucher program. “This feels like just extra money that I can use to start participating more,” said one Seattle resident.
KEY BILLS INTRODUCED:
- Senator Jon Tester (D-MT) S.298 – Senate Campaign Disclosure Parity Act & S.300 – Sunlight for Unaccountable Non-profits (SUN) Act
Here are three things from January 2017 that you need to know:
- President Trump’s conflict of interest saga continues
- Donald J. Trump, elected in part on promises to “drain the swamp,” was sworn into office as the 45th president of the United States.
- Trump’s first press conference made clear that he would not put his assets in a blind trust, instead turning over control to his children, leaving the public with more questions than answers as to how, if at all, his administration would avoid conflicts of interest.
- A prominent bipartisan group of lawyers, including White House ethics advisers and Issue One advisory board members Norm Eisen and Richard Painter, and constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe, launched a suit in an attempt to answer the pressing question of whether President Trump is in violation of the Constitution’s Emoluments Clause.
- President Trump maintained his refusal to release his tax returns—yet that remains the only way the public can know for certain whether or not conflicts exist.
- Additionally, President Trump fulfilled his promise to sign an executive order addressing executive branch ethics and the revolving door, though it was not made a day-one priority.
- Ethics experts, including Issue One’s own Chief of Policy, Programs and Strategy Meredith McGehee, pointed out that, although much of the executive order mirrors President Obama’s own, there are several notable omissions. And at points, it actually strengthens the previous order.
- A number of President Trump’s cabinet nominees have also faced ethical issues, including: Betsy DeVos, Steve Mnuchin, Scott Pruitt, Andrew Puzder, Rex Tillerson.
- Congress tries (and fails) to gut the Office of Congressional Ethics
- In the dead of the night on a holiday, right before the 115th Congress convened, House GOP leaders attempted to gut the independent, bipartisan Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE).
- The Office was established in 2008 after the Jack Abramoff scandal showed the House Ethics Committee was unable to conduct credible investigations into allegations of congressional ethics violations.
- The office is the only source for a credible investigation into congressional ethics, and as such, is little-loved by some elements in each party.
- After a flood of calls and emails from livid constituents, fueled by intense scrutiny from journalists and groups like Issue One, House leadership took the unprecedented step to pull the proposal.
- One little-noticed piece of the OCE amendment that did pass taints its bipartisan integrity. The amendment eliminates the requirement that both party leaders sign off on those individuals appointed to the OCE’s board. This makes clear that despite our early victory, the reform community must remain vigilant to further attacks on ethics in Congress.
- A fight for ethics reform in deep-red South Dakota unfolds
- The South Dakota Legislature declared a “state of emergency” in order to repeal the state’s voter-approved Anti-Corruption Act.
- Lawmakers claimed the measure is overly broad and perhaps unconstitutional, and South Dakota Governor Dennis Daugaard even asserted that voters were somehow ‘’misled’’ by the ballot initiative.
- The attempt to ram through the repeal invited comparisons to the embarrassing OCE drama.
- National attention and public outcry (and even calls from Republicans to slow down the process) caused the vote to be delayed one week. Despite this, the South Dakota Senate voted to repeal the measures. It now heads to Gov. Dennis Daugaard’s desk, where he is expected to sign the repeal bill.
KEY BILLS INTRODUCED:
- Rep. Trott (R-MI) H.R.345 – Stop Foreign Influence Act
- Rep. Trott (R-MI) H.R.346 – Congressional Integrity Act
- Rep. Sarbanes (D-MD) H.R. 20 – Government by the People Act
- Rep. Duncan (R-TN) H.R. 73 – Presidential Library Donation Reform Act
- Rep. DeFazio (D-OR) H.R. 484 – DRAIN the SWAMP Act